16/03/2022
As many are aware, we recently had our appeal at Crown Court Plymouth.
We didn't go in and argue the accusations brought against us, we know what we did and we did it for very good reason.
We had a 43 page skeleton argument based around (mainly) the coronavirus act and the legislation behind it, and where we stand under LAW.
We were told that the Crown Court is NOT a Court of Law (!) So basically our argument couldn't be heard or argued on that day (or in that court!)
We need to take our case/argument higher, and we have every intention to do so, along with many others.
Based on this, their Guilty charge still remains, although our sentences were reduced, all extra costs to date were placed on Finla.
The future of Finla Coffee Limited remains uncertain. Either way, we will fight this case all the way with or without Finla.
We will do everything in our power to keep Finla going, not for ourselves but for our dedicated staff, the humbling support of our customers and for the mental health of so many. We are and have always been a Community base/hub for the people of Plympton and Plymouth, regardless of what some think.... Many know the truth, and it's the truth that keeps us going, along with the future of our next generation, if we continue allowing these people to do what they've been doing for so many years!
We have been asked by many beautiful souls, who are clearly devastated by the recent outcome if they can donate to support us.
Our Gofundme account is still active
https://www.gofundme.com/f/Finla-Coffees-High-Court-Appeal?qid=818073a4e50c5e44202b1aefa95e742b
We intend to use any funds raised to take this onto High or Appeal Court
If you wish to support the future of Finla, visiting our shop for a coffee and cake or a bite to eat is what we need to continue trading, or you can visit our website to purchase Coffee to brew at home.
https://finlacoffeehq.com/
To learn more about our case, our argument and how the court system works, please continue reading below ❤ We can't thank our supporters enough, old and new. Our fight is for you, our fight is for your children ❤
A late directions hearing was arranged for the 2nd March, as no meaningful response was provided to the court for the appeal by Finla. As I walked in I smiled at the judge, he smiled back and said nice to see you Mr Horn.
I appeared before him on the 17 February helping another victim of this COVID-19 response. Why do I say that? On the 4th January I assisted another victim where the court unlawfully used a nuclear option of ‘Judicial Notice’ to by-pass any evidence and lawfulness of the same lawful excuse… A different judge appeared for the appeal on the 3rd and 4th March as the directions hearing judge said may well happen. He had a potential conflict of interest as I had appeared before him, and if he reclused himself I commend him.
For any legislation to have the force of law as courts deal do not deal with fiction, but best available evidence (the highest unrebutted truth) brought before it by the disputing parties and make an impartial judgement based thereupon is how we, the people create our respective laws as promised by the monarch in her promise as to how we will be governed, affirmed in the Bill of Rights 1688 that those governing can do nothing to the prejudice of the people. The Bill of Rights is the constitution of those governing and creates the duties, rights and obligations of what those governing can and cannot do! This is obvious as each person is entrusted to do their part not to knowingly cause another creation harm to our planet for future generations, and we can only take the benefits of creations by applying the best available knowledge.
Therefore for any person’s command to have the ‘force of law’ it must have a good reason (legitimate aim), consider all available options (reasonable), and implement the one which least impacts on another (proportionate).
If someone has knowledge it is not the best way to do something, then they put the person making the command with that knowledge (if needed by notice). This removes their lawful excuse to breach another’s peace and must cease their actions as you have put the lawfulness of their chosen action into dispute, and must desist until the dispute is settled Should the commander ignore that notice they now are acting negligently by not applying the best available knowledge, you then give a reminder notice, and should they ignore that their continued action will be grossly negligent. That results in a ‘letter before action’. The notice puts them with the knowledge and the 2 further notices are the 2 witnesses that they were put with the knowledge. Also the 2 additional notices are your witnesses of their dishonour of you. You thereby have created the record for public dispute resolution as you have failed to resolve your dispute in private, and your record shows they were with the knowledge (the fact the lawfulness of their actions is disputed and as claimant of those rights they must prove their right as you are innocent until proven guilty), and they continued their belief with that knowledge which creates a guilty mind. This then is taken to court and they must explain why they knowingly caused another (creation as well as they are trustees thereof as are you which is why you put them with the best available knowledge and hence followed you duty of care as trustee to future generations), and thereby has breached your and the peoples peace which is a trespass upon your mind, and possibly also body or property.
That we all are equal under the law, and no one is above the law as described above is further affirmed in the ‘citizens arrest’.
The court was also informed of this (noticed in my extensive 43 page skeleton argument, and admitted being with this knowledge), and further was noticed of the law in regards the duties, rights and obligations of its officers (the barristers and judges) and that the court (a legal fiction under whose authority they act) takes any and all breaches seriously and punished them harshly as justice is the foundation for a civilised society, without which the divide and conquer will never end!
All oath, affirmations and attestations of the officers of those governing are according to law. The real problem is mass ignorance as to what is law.
By having correctly held the directors to account for any unlawful actions this has finally also openly correctly addressed ALL directors… if you knowingly cause harm you can be held personally to account – the end of director immunity so Big Pharma not only go bust, but so will their officers as the harm they cause is beyond their financial resources.
The Oath Act 1688 expresses statues, law and customs. Namely the intent at the time which still stands true today is each is distinct, and the monarch oath removes any potential ambiguity where she promises (contract)
‘to govern the peoples of…. according to their respective laws and customs’.
If it was ever intended to be according to the will of Parliament assembled there would have been no need to say law, but simply we will dictate and take from you what we want when we want and would have promised
‘to govern the people according to Acts of Parliament”.
That Parliament assembled does not create duties rights and obligations on all is further admitted by Neil Furgesson, Dominic Cummins and the many other governing official who have not been prosecuted, including Boris Johnson with his parties… They have created common law precedence by their actions which makes all and anything to do with coronavirus void from the beginning. We now must see if The Lord Chancellor ios good to his contract made by affirmation / oath as follows:
“I, [name], do swear that in the office of Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain I will respect the rule of law, defend the independence of the judiciary and discharge my duty to ensure the provision of resources for the efficient and effective support of the courts for which I am responsible. So help me God.”.
Without an independent judiciary that uphold the rule of law there can be no peace!
If you want to learn more about your duties, rights and obligations, and those of other people including those governing we offer a free online course at peacekeepers.org.uk. This already covers notices, and we are in the process of expanding to include the operations of the courts.
Honour means I walk my talk, my word is my bond
Good Faith means I do not put my self interest above that of another, and
Clean hand means all my dealing with another are open honest and transparent.
That is how simple the law is, and how we should interact, and by no longer turning a blind eye when we see a wrong we stand on our rights and harm no one. Those who do not stand on their rights have none – that is natural law!
Whether the courts are corrupt or incompetent I will leave you to decide. I firmly believe yes there is a little corruption here and there – that is human nature and to be expected, however the real problem is ignorance abounds, with us the people as well as those who govern. Stop being a part of the problem, grow up and accept you made mistakes, overcome your ego and become a part of the solution. Knowledge is the first step, and knowledge is only power when you use it!
Equity knows no time, acts in person and will not suffer a wrong without a remedy. Our conscience dictates right from wrong. A wrong is something which causes another harm, and to breach another’s peace. The evidence must be shown that either harm has been caused, or that someone intend to cause another harm before breaching another’s peace. We are all equal under the law and no one is above the law. Legal immunity is merely a belief that does not stand up in court as a truth.
Finla Coffee.
